Tribunal grants relief on disallowance under section 14A and borrowed funds interest

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, providing relief on the disallowance under section 14A and the interest on borrowed funds. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's method of calculation for disallowance under section 14A, restricting it to Rs. 10 lakh. It confirmed that borrowed funds were utilized for business purposes, dismissing the disallowance challenge. The Tribunal also dismissed the ground on bogus purchases and directed adjustments for book profit under section 115JB.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Opportunity of being heard and enhancement of disallowance u/s 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Computation of disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r 8D(2)(ii) and 8D(2)(iii).
3. Disallowance of interest on borrowed funds for non-business purposes.
4. Disallowance of expenses as bogus purchases.
5. Adjustment of book profit u/s 115JB.

Issue-wise Analysis:

1. Opportunity of being heard and enhancement of disallowance u/s 14A:

The assessee contended that sufficient opportunity was not provided, leading to enhancement of disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r 8D. However, the Tribunal found that the assessment order was framed u/s 143(3) of the Act, and the assessee's counsel was heard and arguments considered. Thus, the Tribunal dismissed this ground, confirming that proper opportunity was provided.

2. Computation of disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r 8D(2)(ii) and 8D(2)(iii):

The assessee argued that its own funds covered the investments and that the method of calculation used by the assessee should be accepted based on the rule of consistency. The Tribunal noted that the issue had been previously decided in favor of the assessee for earlier years (2008-09 to 2011-12) and upheld the assessee's method of calculation. The Tribunal directed the disallowance to be restricted to Rs. 10 lakh under section 14A r.w.r 8D(2)(iii) against the assessee's claim of Rs. 1 lakh, following the principle of consistency.

3. Disallowance of interest on borrowed funds for non-business purposes:

The assessee challenged the disallowance of Rs. 19.74 crores on the basis that borrowed funds were used for non-business purposes. The Tribunal referred to the previous decisions for AY 2008-09 and 2009-10, where it was held that the advances given to Mr. Thakur were for business purposes. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficient own funds and that the advances were business transactions. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's claim, confirming that the funds were utilized for business purposes.

4. Disallowance of expenses as bogus purchases:

The assessee did not advance serious arguments against the disallowance of Rs. 1,14,192/- as bogus purchases. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed this ground as not pressed.

5. Adjustment of book profit u/s 115JB:

This issue was deemed consequential. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to adjust the book profit of the assessee in line with the Tribunal's decision on the disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r 8D(2).

Conclusion:

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, providing relief on the disallowance u/s 14A and the interest on borrowed funds while dismissing the ground on bogus purchases and directing consequential adjustments for book profit u/s 115JB.

---