Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether royalty paid under the licence agreement was includible in the assessable value of the imported goods under Rule 9(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.
Analysis: Includibility of royalty or technical know-how charges depends on whether such payment is a condition precedent for the supply of the imported goods and has a nexus with their pricing. The impugned order did not disclose the essential facts showing how the royalty payments were connected with the imported goods, and the licence agreement did not establish that payment of royalty was a pre-condition for their supply. The reliance placed on the earlier decision concerning a different factual situation was therefore misplaced.
Conclusion: The royalty was not includible in the assessable value and the order demanding such inclusion could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed and the impugned order was set aside on the ground that the royalty payment did not form part of the assessable value of the imported goods.
Ratio Decidendi: Royalty or technical know-how payments are includible in the assessable value only when they constitute a condition precedent for the supply of the imported goods and have a direct nexus with their pricing.