TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Special Leave Petitions Dismissed with Delay Condoned, Pending Applications Disposed</h1> <h3>PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II, JAIPUR Versus M/s. RAJASTHAN STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LTD.</h3> SC dismissed the Special Leave Petitions after condoning the delay and disposed of pending applications. - PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II, JAIPUR ... Expenditure of privilege fee treated as allowable expenditure Excise duty addition to closing stock - applicably of provisions of section 145A - Held that:- Under Section 145A only the tax duty, cess or fees actually paid or incurred by the assessee to bring the goods to its place of location forms part value of stock. Unpaid excise duty on goods in stock that have not left the premises/factory/bonded warehouse, could not be added to the value of closing stock. Addition on account of depositing the PF/ESI payment beyond the prescribed time - Held that:- If PF/EPF/CPF/GPF etc., if paid after due date under the respective Act but before filing of the return of income under Section 139(1) of the IT Act, the same cannot be disallowed. - HC order [2016 (5) TMI 1326 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] confirmed The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions after condoning the delay. Pending applications were also disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
