Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deduction under section 80IB(10) was allowable to an assessee who developed and constructed a housing project on land not owned by it, or whether the assessee was merely a works contractor and therefore ineligible.
Analysis: The deduction under section 80IB(10) is intended for an undertaking developing and building approved housing projects. Ownership of the land is not a condition expressly required by the provision. On the facts, the assessee had undertaken development of the housing project, borne the project risk, and exercised control over the execution of the project. The authorities below relied on the same legal position as laid down by the jurisdictional High Court in the cases of Radhe Developers and Shakti Corporation, where it was held that the decisive test is whether the assessee developed the project as a developer and not merely as a contractor.
Conclusion: Deduction under section 80IB(10) was correctly allowed, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: For deduction under section 80IB(10), ownership of the land is not essential if the assessee has developed and built the housing project on its own account and not merely as a works contractor.