Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 3/2004-CE for clearances of PVC pipes made against a certificate issued by the specified authority, and whether the conditions of the notification stood satisfied.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier decision on the same notification and examined the scope of the expression "water supply plant" in the Explanation to the notification. It held that a pumping station used for supply of water falls within that expression. It further held that the discharge chamber constituted a storage facility for the purposes of the notification. On the facts, the goods had been cleared under a valid certificate issued by the competent authority, and the subsequent cancellation of that certificate did not affect clearances already made before cancellation.
Conclusion: The appellant satisfied the conditions of the notification and was entitled to the exemption.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are cleared against a valid certificate issued by the specified authority and the project answers the notification's conditions, exemption cannot be denied merely because the certificate is cancelled later.