TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Professional misconduct leads to removal from Chartered Accountants' Register</h1> <h3>Council of Instt. Of Chartered Accountants of India Versus Subodh Gupta & Anr.</h3> Council of Instt. Of Chartered Accountants of India Versus Subodh Gupta & Anr. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Professional Misconduct2. Other Misconduct3. Validity of Disciplinary Proceedings4. Role and Permissions of a Chartered AccountantIssue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Professional Misconduct:The respondent, a practicing Chartered Accountant, was indicted for professional misconduct under Clause 11 of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The complaint from Punjab National Bank alleged that the respondent incorporated three companies and a trust and opened accounts in their names. He was actively involved in these entities, signing balance sheets and operating bank accounts without obtaining prior permission from the Institute of Chartered Accountants. The Disciplinary Committee found the respondent guilty of professional misconduct, noting his involvement in day-to-day operations and financial transactions of the companies and trust.2. Other Misconduct:The respondent was also charged with other misconduct under Section 22 read with Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. It was alleged that he, in connivance with the Branch Manager, defrauded the bank. The Committee noted that the respondent was involved in fraudulent activities, such as obtaining clean overdrafts without security and misappropriating funds through fictitious entries and demand drafts. Despite the pending criminal suit, the Committee found sufficient evidence of the respondent's involvement in these fraudulent activities, thus holding him guilty of other misconduct.3. Validity of Disciplinary Proceedings:The respondent argued that the trial before the CBI Court was not yet over and that the disciplinary proceedings should not proceed. However, the court held that the disciplinary proceedings were independent of the criminal trial. The charges in the disciplinary proceedings pertained to the respondent's professional conduct as a Chartered Accountant, which was distinct from the criminal charges of conspiracy and cheating.4. Role and Permissions of a Chartered Accountant:The respondent contended that he was an honorary director and did not require specific permission from the Institute. However, the evidence showed that the respondent was actively involved in the companies' operations, signing balance sheets, operating bank accounts, and engaging in financial transactions. The court emphasized that a practicing Chartered Accountant cannot act as a director of a company without the Council's permission and cannot actively carry on business through companies, trusts, and firms. The respondent's actions were in violation of these professional standards.Conclusion:The court affirmed the findings of the Disciplinary Committee and the Council, holding the respondent guilty of professional misconduct and other misconduct. Considering the gravity of the misconduct, the court imposed the penalty of removing the respondent's name from the Register of Members of the Institute of Chartered Accountants for a period of two years. The court emphasized that the respondent's active participation in business activities and fraudulent transactions was incompatible with the ethical standards expected of a Chartered Accountant.
TaxTMI 