Clarificatory exemption for PDS kerosene was treated as retrospective, barring excise duty during the interregnum.

Notification No. 4/2005-C.E. was treated as clarificatory and curative because it implemented an already declared policy not to burden PDS kerosene with excise duty after withdrawal of the warehousing facility. On that basis, the exemption was held applicable to clearances made during the interregnum, and duty could not be levied merely because the notification was issued later. The refund claim was therefore justified, and the Revenue challenge failed. The valuation objection was not examined further as it had become academic.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether Notification No. 4/2005-C.E. dated 01.03.2005, issued after withdrawal of the warehousing facility, operated retrospectively so as to exempt PDS kerosene cleared during the interregnum from excise duty.

Analysis: The circular issued on 04.09.2004 made clear that the Government's policy was not to burden PDS kerosene with excise duty and that the withdrawal of warehousing was not intended to alter the end-use exemption. The subsequent notification of 01.03.2005 carried the same policy objective and was treated as clarificatory and curative in nature. Such a notification, issued to remove hardship and advance public welfare, is to be construed liberally and given retrospective effect where the earlier policy already existed. On that basis, duty could not be levied merely because the exemption notification was issued later.

Conclusion: The exemption applied to the disputed clearances and the refund was justified; the Revenue's challenge failed.

Final Conclusion: The assessee's appeals succeeded and the duty demand for the relevant period was not sustainable, while the valuation objection was not adjudicated as it was treated as academic.

Ratio Decidendi: A notification issued to implement an already declared governmental policy and to remove hardship is capable of being construed as clarificatory and retrospective, so that duty cannot be levied for the interregnum when the policy itself had already been in force.

---