Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Court emphasizes Central Govt approval for interest rate in loan transactions</h1> <h3>M/s. Tej Quebcor Printing Ltd. Versus Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax</h3> M/s. Tej Quebcor Printing Ltd. Versus Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax - [2017] 392 ITR 67 Issues:Interpretation of Section 10(15)(iv)(c) of the Income Tax Act - Approval by Central Government for rate of interest and compliance with statutory conditions.Analysis:Issue 1: Interpretation of Section 10(15)(iv)(c) of the Income Tax ActThe case involved the interpretation of Section 10(15)(iv)(c) of the Income Tax Act, which pertains to the approval of the Central Government regarding the rate of interest for loans taken by industrial undertakings for specific purposes. The assessee, engaged in printing and binding business, imported machinery on deferred credit and sought approval under this section. The Department of Economic Affairs and RBI granted approvals related to the loan amount, interest rate, and repayment terms. The dispute arose when the AO disallowed the deduction under Section 40(a)(i) of the Act for failure to deduct tax under Section 195. The CIT(A) granted relief, emphasizing compliance with statutory conditions based on approvals received. However, the ITAT overturned the decision, citing delayed approach to the Department of Revenue and failure to deduct tax as reasons for disallowance.Issue 2: Approval by Central Government for rate of interest and compliance with statutory conditionsThe critical contention revolved around whether the approvals obtained from the Department of Economic Affairs and Department of Revenue satisfied the requirement of Central Government approval as per Section 10(15)(iv)(c). The Court analyzed the approvals granted by both departments and emphasized that the essence of the provision was Central Government's approval concerning the rate of interest, not the specific department. The Court noted that the Department of Revenue's approval did not contradict the Department of Economic Affairs' approval and focused on the rate of interest. It held that the failure to deduct tax under Section 195 did not invalidate the approvals received, and the denial of relief by the ITAT was unwarranted. Consequently, the Court set aside the ITAT's decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and allowing the appeal for deduction of interest claimed in the return.In conclusion, the judgment clarified the significance of Central Government approval under Section 10(15)(iv)(c) for the rate of interest in loan transactions, emphasizing compliance with statutory conditions based on approvals obtained from relevant government departments. The Court's interpretation upheld the assessee's entitlement to the deduction claimed, highlighting the importance of understanding statutory provisions and approvals in tax matters.