Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2017 (2) TMI 669 - AT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Classification of Paneer Darbari & Combo Packs under Customs Tariff, Exemption Denied. Duty based on MRP. The Tribunal classified paneer darbari under 2001.10, granting exemption under Notification No.6/2002. Combo packs of basmati rice with dal tadka/rajma ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Classification of Paneer Darbari & Combo Packs under Customs Tariff, Exemption Denied. Duty based on MRP.

                          The Tribunal classified paneer darbari under 2001.10, granting exemption under Notification No.6/2002. Combo packs of basmati rice with dal tadka/rajma masala were classified under Heading 21.08, ineligible for the exemption. Duty was to be paid based on the total MRP of the combo pack. No penalty was imposed, and the original authority was directed to re-quantify the demand as per the Tribunal's decision.




                          Issues:
                          Classification of Ready to Eat Food Products under Notification No.6/2002-CE, Central Excise duty demand, Education Cess recovery, Penalty imposition, Classification of various edible preparations, Valuation for charging duty based on MRP, Applicability of Notification No.6/2002-CE on combo packs, Classification of paneer darbari, Classification of basmati rice and dal tadka/rajma masala combo packs.

                          Classification of Ready to Eat Food Products under Notification No.6/2002-CE:
                          The appellants, manufacturers of excisable goods, classified their products under CSH 2108.99 of CETA, 1985, claiming Nil rate of duty under Notification No.6/2002-CE. The Commissioner alleged that the products were not similar to those specified under the said Notification, leading to a show-cause notice. The Hon'ble CESTAT remanded the case for reconsideration, emphasizing reclassification possibilities and the duty treatment. Subsequently, the Commissioner re-adjudicated the matter, classifying edible preparations differently under various subheadings and exemption clauses.

                          Classification of various edible preparations:
                          The dispute involved the classification of products like paneer darbari, basmati rice, dal tadka, and rajma masala. The appellant argued for classification based on the predominant composition of vegetables in paneer darbari under 2001.10, making it eligible for exemption. Combo packs of basmati rice with dal tadka/rajma masala were considered under Heading 21.08, not entitled to the exemption under Notification No.6/2002. The Tribunal upheld the classification decisions based on the essential character of the products and their intended use as combo packs.

                          Valuation for charging duty based on MRP:
                          Regarding the valuation for charging duty based on MRP within combo packs, the appellant suggested splitting the MRP between the products. However, the Tribunal disagreed, stating that the combo pack should be assessed as a whole based on its total MRP. The Tribunal also clarified that the cited decision on splitting MRP was not applicable to the present case due to differing circumstances.

                          Applicability of Notification No.6/2002-CE on combo packs:
                          The Tribunal concluded that the combo packs of basmati rice with dal tadka/rajma masala were rightly classified under Heading 21.08, not eligible for the exemption under Notification No.6/2002. Duty was to be paid based on the MRP of the combo pack as a unit, without splitting the MRP between the individual products within the pack.

                          Final Decision:
                          The Tribunal classified paneer darbari under 2001.10, making it eligible for exemption under Notification No.6/2002. Combo packs of basmati rice with dal tadka/rajma masala were classified under Heading 21.08, not entitled to the exemption. The duty was to be paid based on the total MRP of the combo pack. No penalty was imposed due to the nature of the dispute being a classification issue. The original adjudicating authority was directed to re-quantify the demand in line with the Tribunal's decision.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found