Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order of the learned Single Judge granting time to the borrower to comply with the one time settlement and postponing sale of the secured asset called for interference in intra-court appeal.
Analysis: The borrower had defaulted in repayment, the account had been classified as non-performing, and proceedings had been initiated under the SARFAESI regime after issuance of notice under Section 13(2). The borrower had also failed to honour the extended settlement schedule, and the record showed continued non-payment even during the appeal period. The Court noted that the writ petition had been entertained despite the availability of an efficacious statutory remedy, but the learned Single Judge had exercised discretion to afford a further opportunity to clear the dues. In the circumstances, the Court found no justification to interfere with that discretionary relief, though it considered it appropriate to extend the time for payment and protect the Bank's enforcement rights in default.
Conclusion: The order of the learned Single Judge was substantially sustained, with the time for payment extended and the Bank left free to proceed with recovery upon default.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were disposed of by maintaining the borrower's limited relief of additional time while preserving the Bank's right to enforce its security if the settlement amount was not paid within the extended period.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a court has already exercised discretion to grant limited time for compliance in a SARFAESI matter, interference in intra-court appeal is unwarranted absent compelling grounds, and the secured creditor's recovery rights remain intact on default.