Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether differential sugar cess could be demanded on sugar already cleared from the factory on payment of the applicable duty and cess at the time of clearance, merely because the rate of sugar cess was enhanced later.
Analysis: Section 3(4) of the Sugar Cess Act, 1982 applies the Central Excise law and rules to levy and collection of sugar cess. On that basis, the relevant liability arises at the time of clearance of the goods from the factory. Once sugar had been cleared on payment of the appropriate duty and cess then applicable, there was no legal basis to treat the goods as short-paid or to recover an enhanced cess introduced after clearance. The subsequent increase in cess could not be applied retrospectively to goods already cleared.
Conclusion: The demand for differential sugar cess was not sustainable and the appeals were allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Sugar cess, being governed by the same levy and collection framework as central excise under Section 3(4) of the Sugar Cess Act, 1982, is chargeable at the time of clearance and cannot be demanded at an enhanced rate on goods already cleared on payment of the then-applicable duty and cess.