TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal allows credit for tyres used in dumpers as essential manufacturing inputs</h1> <h3>M/s. Penna Cement Industries Ltd, Versus CC, CE & ST, Guntur</h3> M/s. Penna Cement Industries Ltd, Versus CC, CE & ST, Guntur - TMI Issues:1. Allegation of irregular availment of credit under the category of capital goods on duty paid on tyres used for dumpers.2. Eligibility of credit on tyres used for dumpers under the category of inputs.Analysis:Issue 1: Allegation of irregular availment of credit under the category of capital goods on duty paid on tyres used for dumpersThe appellants, engaged in the manufacture of Cement and Cement clinker, were issued a Show Cause Notice alleging irregular availment of credit under the category of capital goods on the duty paid on tyres used for dumpers during a specific period. The original authority dropped the proceedings, stating that the appellant is eligible for credit. However, the Department appealed the decision, and the Commissioner (Appeals) held that the tyres used for dumpers do not fall within the definition of capital goods, thereby disallowing the credit. The appellants challenged this decision before the Tribunal.Issue 2: Eligibility of credit on tyres used for dumpers under the category of inputsThe appellant argued that the credit on tyres used for dumpers should be eligible under the category of inputs, not capital goods. The appellant contended that the tyres are essential inputs for the dumpers used to transport limestone from mines to the factory. The appellant relied on a previous decision in the case of M/s. Aditya Cement vs. CCE, Jaipur-II [2016-TIOL-2582-CESTAT-DEL]. The Tribunal, after considering the arguments from both sides, referred to the case law and held that tyres, being necessary accessories to dumpers, which are considered capital goods used in manufacturing activities and are integrally connected to the production of final products, should be eligible for credit under the category of inputs. Citing the decision in M/s. Aditya Cement, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with any consequential reliefs.In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the credit on tyres used for dumpers is admissible under the category of inputs, overturning the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and providing consequential reliefs as necessary.
TaxTMI 