Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>ITAT Mumbai upholds deletion of income addition due to inadequate consideration of evidence</h1> <h3>ACIT, 9 (1), Mumbai Versus M/s. Apollo Heat Exchangers Pvt. Ltd.</h3> ACIT, 9 (1), Mumbai Versus M/s. Apollo Heat Exchangers Pvt. Ltd. - TMI Issues:1. Addition of &8377; 74.28 lakhs based on purchases found to be bogus.2. Failure to produce suppliers for verification.3. Disallowance of purchases and subsequent appeal.Analysis:1. The Assessing Officer (AO) added &8377; 74.28 lakhs to the total income of the assessee after finding that purchases made were not verifiable and that the suppliers admitted to providing accommodation entries. The AO issued a show cause notice but the assessee failed to produce the suppliers for verification, leading to the addition.2. The assessee appealed before the First Appellate Authority (FAA), providing documentary evidence of genuine purchases and highlighting that the suppliers' statements were general in nature. The FAA noted that the AO failed to allow cross-examination of the suppliers and did not consider the specific documents provided by the assessee. Referring to relevant cases, the FAA deleted the addition made by the AO.3. The Departmental Representative (DR) supported the AO's order, emphasizing the non-production of suppliers. The Authorized Representative (AR) defended the assessee's position, stating that all necessary evidence was submitted. The ITAT Mumbai considered the material before them, noting the lack of consideration of documentary evidence by the AO and the failure to provide an opportunity for cross-examination. Referring to precedents, the ITAT upheld the FAA's decision and dismissed the AO's appeal.