Cenvat credit on GTA outward transport turns on whether goods moved up to the depot as place of removal.

Cenvat credit on service tax paid for GTA services used in outward transportation is admissible only if the service is linked to clearance of goods up to the place of removal. The text notes that a depot may constitute the place of removal under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, which could support credit where goods are transported up to that depot. However, the supporting documents and statements were not properly examined, so the factual basis for eligibility could not be verified. The matter was remanded for fresh verification and a de novo decision on whether the transportation related to movement of goods up to the depot.

---

---

Issues: Whether Cenvat credit on service tax paid on GTA services used for outward transportation was admissible where the goods were cleared up to the depot as the place of removal.

Analysis: Credit under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 depends on whether the input service is used in connection with clearance of goods up to the place of removal. The records suggested that the transportation may have been connected with clearances to the depot, and the depot could constitute the place of removal under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. However, the documents and statements filed before the lower authorities were not properly examined, so it was not possible to conclusively verify whether the credit related to outward transportation up to the depot.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded for fresh verification of the documents and statements, with a direction to decide afresh whether the service tax paid on transportation related to movement of goods up to the depot; if so, the appellant would be entitled to the Cenvat credit.

---