Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit could be denied on inputs used in the manufacture of windmill gear boxes when the final products were cleared both on exemption and on payment of duty.
Analysis: The record showed that the windmill gear boxes were not manufactured exclusively as exempted goods; they were cleared in part under exemption and in part on payment of duty. In such a situation, the basis for denying credit on the footing of exclusive use in exempted goods failed. The Tribunal also noted that the same issue had earlier been decided in the assessee's own case on identical facts.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit could not be denied on the premise of exclusive use in exempted goods, and the Revenue's challenge failed.