Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the permission granted for provisional assessment under Rule 9B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 continued to remain valid after the Central Excise Rules, 2002 came into force, and whether the assessment and consequential refund could be denied as time-barred.
Analysis: The existing permission for provisional assessment was held to survive by virtue of the saving provision in section 38A(c) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, which preserves rights, obligations and liabilities accrued under repealed or superseded rules unless a contrary intention appears. On that basis, the earlier provisional assessment could not be treated as ineffective merely because the 2002 Rules had replaced the old regime. The denial to finalize the assessment on the footing that it was not provisional was therefore unsustainable. The record also showed no deliberate delay or laches on the part of the assessee in seeking finalisation. Once the assessment was to be treated as provisional, finalisation and refund had to follow under the new procedural regime.
Conclusion: The assessee succeeded; the refusal to finalise the provisional assessment was set aside and the matter was remanded with directions to finalise the assessment under Rule 7 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 and grant the resultant refund with interest.