Conditional customs exemption for re-imported goods remanded for fresh proof of eligibility under the notification.

Re-imported goods exported under a duty exemption scheme were found to be eligible for Customs Notification No. 94/96 only if the prescribed conditions, including the relevant requirement in column 3, were satisfied. On the existing record, compliance with the material condition was not established, so the exemption claim could not be accepted outright. The appellant was nevertheless allowed to produce evidence of entitlement and compliance with the notification and its proviso. The matter was therefore remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after a fair opportunity to establish the benefit claim.

---

---

Issues: Whether re-imported goods exported under the duty exemption scheme were entitled to exemption under Customs Notification No. 94/96 and, in the absence of proof of compliance with the notification conditions, the matter required remand for fresh adjudication.

Analysis: The exemption under the notification was conditional and depended on satisfaction of the prescribed requirements, including the relevant condition in column 3 for goods exported under the duty exemption scheme. As the record did not establish compliance with the material condition, the claim for exemption could not be accepted on the existing material. At the same time, the appellant was entitled to place the necessary evidence before the appellate authority to establish eligibility and compliance with the notification and its proviso.

Conclusion: The appeals were remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after giving the appellant a fair opportunity to prove entitlement to the notification benefit.

---