ITAT Chennai: Interest on Non-Performing Assets Not Income Until Recovery

The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai upheld the lower authority's decision in appeals regarding the assessment of income on non-performing assets for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11. The Tribunal ruled that interest on non-performing assets should not be recognized as income until the principal amount is recovered, despite arguments based on the mercantile system of accounting and prudential norms by the Reserve Bank of India. The consistent practice of recognizing interest on a receipt basis by the cooperative bank prevailed, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeals.

---

---

Issues: Assessment of income on non-performing assets

Analysis:
The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai involved appeals against the common order of the Commissioner of Income-tax for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11. The primary issue in both appeals was the assessment of income on non-performing assets. The Departmental representative argued that the interest on overdue amounts should be recognized as income, as per the Income-tax Act. The representative contended that even if the interest was not recognized by the assessee, it should still be treated as income. However, the assessee, a cooperative bank, followed the practice of recognizing interest income on a receipt basis for non-performing assets, as the recovery of principal amounts was uncertain.

The Departmental representative emphasized that the interest on advanced loans should be recognized on an accrual basis, as the bank followed the mercantile system of accounting. They argued that the prudential norms by the Reserve Bank of India should not override the Income-tax Act. On the other hand, the representative for the assessee argued that since the principal amount was not recoverable and classified as a non-performing asset, the interest should not be accrued. They maintained that income would be recognized only upon recovery of the principal amount along with interest.

The Tribunal analyzed the submissions and found that the bank consistently followed the practice of recognizing interest on non-performing assets on a receipt basis. It was noted that when the recovery of the principal amount was uncertain, the interest could not be considered as accrued income. The Tribunal held that the Income-tax Act prevails over regulations by the Reserve Bank of India. Therefore, based on the accounting method consistently followed by the assessee, the interest income on non-performing assets was not deemed as income. Consequently, the Tribunal confirmed the order of the lower authority, dismissing the appeals of the Revenue.

In conclusion, the judgment clarified the treatment of income on non-performing assets, emphasizing the importance of consistent accounting practices and the primacy of the Income-tax Act in such assessments.

---