High Court orders release of detained goods upon payment of tax, petitioner retains right to challenge. The High Court directed the respondent to release the detained goods and vehicle upon payment of a one-time tax amounting to Rs. 1,10,969. The court ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
High Court orders release of detained goods upon payment of tax, petitioner retains right to challenge.
The High Court directed the respondent to release the detained goods and vehicle upon payment of a one-time tax amounting to Rs. 1,10,969. The court clarified that this payment would not prejudice the petitioner's right to challenge the tax and compounding fee through legal avenues. The petitioner was granted liberty to contest both charges as per the law. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.
Issues: Challenge to order directing payment of one time tax and compounding fee for detained goods without an inward way bill.
Analysis: The petitioner challenged an order dated 30.12.2016 directing the payment of one time tax and compounding fee for goods detained at a checkpost. The goods, transported from Daman to Chennai, were detained at the Ranipet Checkpost on the same day for not being accompanied by an inward way bill. The petitioner, despite producing the inward way bill after the detention order, faced delays in the release of the goods. The petitioner expressed willingness to pay the one time tax to expedite the release of the goods, reserving the right to challenge the tax and compounding fee imposed. The respondent, represented by the Additional Government Pleader, agreed to release the goods upon payment of the one time tax.
The High Court directed the respondent to release the goods and the vehicle upon payment of the one time tax amounting to Rs. 1,10,969. The court clarified that the payment of tax would not prejudice the petitioner's rights to challenge the tax and compounding fee through appropriate legal remedies. The petitioner was granted liberty to challenge both the tax and compounding fee in accordance with the law. The writ petition was disposed of based on the direction for the release of goods, with no order as to costs.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.