Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a VAT audit and consequential assessment orders could be sustained when the audit was authorised by a Joint Commissioner instead of the Commissioner under Section 64(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.
Analysis: Section 64(4) empowered only the Commissioner to order audit of a registered dealer's business by an officer not below the rank of Deputy Commercial Tax Officer. The proceedings relied upon by the revenue showed that the Joint Commissioners of the Enforcement Wing were asked to authorise officers for audit, which amounted to a delegation of the Commissioner's power. Such delegation was not supported by the statutory scheme. Since the audit itself was initiated without authority, the assessment orders founded on that audit could not stand.
Conclusion: The audit authorisation was without jurisdiction and the consequential assessment orders were unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The writ petitions succeeded, the impugned assessment orders and VAT audit reports were set aside, and liberty was left open to conduct a fresh audit and pass fresh orders in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute vests a power exclusively in a specified authority, that power cannot be delegated or exercised by another authority unless the statute expressly permits it; any proceeding founded on such unauthorised exercise is without jurisdiction.