TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted interim protection against realization of the penalty imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, pending exchange of affidavits and further hearing.
Analysis: The writ petition raised issues that required the respondents to file affidavits. Pending further consideration, the Court found it appropriate to protect the petitioner from coercive recovery, taking note of the earlier orders relied upon in support of the challenge.
Outcome: Affidavit-in-opposition directed to be filed within three weeks, reply within a week thereafter, the writ petition listed for hearing, and no steps for realization of the penalty to be taken without leave of the Court till 30 April 2017 or until further order, whichever is earlier.
TaxTMI 
