Appeal dismissed by CESTAT NEW DELHI due to non-appearance. Adjournment request denied. The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their representative. The application ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal dismissed by CESTAT NEW DELHI due to non-appearance. Adjournment request denied.
The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their representative. The application for adjournment was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed for non-appearance.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the appeal due to non-appearance of the appellant or their representative. The application for adjournment was rejected as the Advocate's engagement with another authority was not a sufficient justification. The appeal was dismissed for non-appearance.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.