1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal dismissed by CESTAT NEW DELHI due to non-appearance. Adjournment request denied.</h1> The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their representative. The application ... Advocate is engaged before some other authority on the day when the matter is fixed before the Tribunal, cannot be a justification for adjournment. It was necessary for the concerned Advocate to make necessary arrangement, when he has to appear for the appellant on this date. Merely sending an application is not sufficient. Hence the application for adjournment is reject and in the absence of appellant or his representative, the appeal is dismissed for non-appearance. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the appeal due to non-appearance of the appellant or their representative. The application for adjournment was rejected as the Advocate's engagement with another authority was not a sufficient justification. The appeal was dismissed for non-appearance.