TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Allows Conversion of Shipping Bills Under DEEC Scheme, Emphasizes Evidence Standard</h1> <h3>SM HERBALS PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI</h3> SM HERBALS PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI - 2009 (237) E.L.T. 531 (Tri. - Del.) Issues: Conversion of free shipping bills to shipping bills under DEEC Scheme; Applicability of Circular No. 4 of 2004; Use of duty-free inputs in export products; Examination of goods by Excise and Customs authorities.In this case, the primary issue revolved around the conversion of free shipping bills to shipping bills under the Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEEC) Scheme. The appellant had imported Taxus Baccata under DEEC Licences but failed to mention the Licence numbers in the shipping bills during export, resulting in the bills being treated as free shipping bills. The appellant later sought conversion, which was rejected by the Original Authority. The appellant argued that subsequent exports to the same foreign buyer under the DEEC scheme, compliance with SION norms, and examination under CITES requirements supported their request for conversion. The advocate highlighted the relevance of Section 149 of the Customs Act in this context.The Circular No. 4 of 2004 was a crucial aspect discussed during the proceedings. The Circular prohibited the conversion of free shipping bills into shipping bills under different schemes, with limited exceptions subject to specified conditions. The respondent, represented by the DR, emphasized that allowing conversion of free shipping bills post-export could lead to potential misuse of concessions, especially since the goods had not undergone examination by the Excise or Customs authorities at the port.Upon careful consideration of the arguments presented by both sides, the Tribunal observed that the Circular did not outrightly prohibit conversion, especially if substantial evidence existed demonstrating the use of duty-free inputs in the exported products. While acknowledging the importance of subsequent exports and CITES certification as corroborative evidence, the Tribunal noted that these crucial pieces of evidence were not submitted before the Commissioner during the initial decision-making process. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the earlier order and remanded the matter to the Commissioner for a fresh review, emphasizing the need for a reasonable opportunity for the appellant to present their case effectively.Overall, the judgment focused on the procedural aspects of conversion under the DEEC Scheme, the implications of Circular No. 4 of 2004, the necessity of evidence supporting the use of duty-free inputs, and the significance of examinations by Excise and Customs authorities in determining the validity of conversion requests.
TaxTMI 