TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the existence of an international transaction in relation to advertisement, marketing and sales promotion expenses had to be decided by the Tribunal on the existing material; (ii) whether the Tribunal could remand that question to another authority instead of deciding it itself.
Issue (i): Whether the existence of an international transaction in relation to advertisement, marketing and sales promotion expenses had to be decided by the Tribunal on the existing material.
Analysis: The dispute centered on whether AMP expenditure could be treated as an international transaction under transfer pricing provisions. The order noted that the Tribunal had not returned a categorical finding on that central question. It was also observed that if the question were answered against the Revenue, no further issue would survive on that aspect.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was required to decide the existence of the international transaction itself.
Issue (ii): Whether the Tribunal could remand that question to another authority instead of deciding it itself.
Analysis: The order held that the question on existence of an international transaction had to be determined by the Tribunal and not sent back to the Transfer Pricing Officer, Dispute Resolution Panel, or Assessing Officer. Only if the Tribunal found an international transaction and the material was inadequate on arm's length price could a further remand on that limited issue be made.
Conclusion: The Tribunal could not remand the threshold question of existence of the international transaction to another authority.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was restored to the Tribunal for fresh decision on the threshold issue, with the appeal disposed of by directing the Tribunal to first determine whether an international transaction existed.
Ratio Decidendi: The existence of an international transaction under transfer pricing law is a jurisdictional threshold issue that must be decided by the Tribunal on the material before it and cannot be delegated by remand to another authority.
TaxTMI 
