Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to exemption from Special Additional Duty of customs under the relevant notifications when the imported goods were sold as such in Daman and some clearances were made against Form ST-XI.
Analysis: The appellant was a registered trader at the time of import, and the record showed sale of the imported goods to various manufacturers. The evidence included invoices, sales tax registration, and material indicating that sales tax was charged on some transactions, while other clearances were made under Form ST-XI. On these facts, the authority below had proceeded on an incomplete appreciation of the record and had incorrectly treated the sales as outside the taxing net without properly considering the documentary evidence produced by the appellant.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to the notification benefit and the demand of Special Additional Duty could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the importer establishes that the goods were sold as such by a registered trader and the record shows local sales tax compliance on the relevant transactions, exemption from Special Additional Duty under the governing notifications cannot be denied merely because some sales were made under Form ST-XI.