Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether crude palm oil imported by the appellant was correctly classifiable under heading 1511 10 00 as crude oil, and whether delay in testing the sample affected the carotenoid value so as to deny the reduced customs duty benefit under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus.
Analysis: The imported goods were not in dispute as palm oil falling under heading 1511. The CRCL report described the sample as "raw grade palm oil", which supported classification as crude oil under heading 1511 10 00 rather than under the residual entry 1511 90 90. The sample testing was also delayed by 14, 18 and 38 days, and such delay was held to affect carotenoid value. On that basis, the reduced duty benefit could not be denied merely because the tested carotenoid value fell below the prescribed range.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to classification under heading 1511 10 00 and to the benefit of reduced customs duty under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus.