TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Imported Crude Palm Oil (CPO) Classified Correctly for Duty Rate</h1> <h3>Godrej Industries Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai</h3> Godrej Industries Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai - 2017 (357) E.L.T. 899 (Tri. - Mumbai) Issues: Classification of imported crude palm oil (CPO) under Chapter Heading 1511100 for concessional duty rate.Analysis:1. The issue in this case revolves around the classification of crude palm oil (CPO) imported by the appellant. The appellant sought clearance of CPO under Chapter Heading 1511100 to avail the benefit of a concessional rate of duty. However, the samples drawn and tested indicated that the carotenoid value was below the prescribed limit, leading to a dispute over the classification of the imported goods.2. The adjudicating authority held that the goods imported were not CPO and should be classified under 15119090, resulting in a higher duty rate. The appellant contested this decision, arguing that the delay in testing the samples caused a decrease in the carotenoid value, affecting the classification. The appellant relied on previous case law and decisions to support their claim.3. The appellate authority upheld the adjudicating authority's decision, stating that the appellant did not challenge the test report or request a second test. The appellant's counsel argued that the delay in testing the samples was crucial, citing a previous Tribunal case where a similar delay led to a favorable decision for the importer.4. Upon reviewing the records and tariff entries, the Tribunal agreed with the appellant's contention that the imported goods should be classified under 15111000 as raw grade palm oil, which is synonymous with crude oil. The Tribunal acknowledged that the delay in testing the samples indeed impacted the carotenoid value, as established in previous case law.5. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that they were eligible for the reduced rate of customs duty under Notification No.21/2002-Cus. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.
TaxTMI 