Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit could be denied where the duty on imported inputs was discharged by debit in DFCE account and the assessments were accepted without objection, and whether the demand could survive in the absence of willful suppression.
Analysis: The imported goods were cleared on assessed bills of entry, the duty element was discharged through debit in the DFCE account, and the customs authorities raised no objection at the relevant time. The dispute was also viewed as revenue neutral, as the appellant could utilize the available scrip balance for subsequent imports. On these facts, the ingredients of willful suppression or misrepresentation were not established, and the denial of credit was found to be unsustainable.
Conclusion: The denial of Cenvat credit was set aside and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.