1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal affirms inclusion of SIM card sales commission in service tax, dismissing Revenue's appeal</h1> The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) determining that the commission received by the respondent for selling SIM cards had ... Business Auxiliary Service - commission received from BSNL for selling of SIM cards - whether the commission will be included in assessable value? - Held that: - the price at which the ultimate customer purchases the SIM Card is βΉ 331/- and admitted that BSNL pays βΉ 31 as Service Tax on the same - Revenue further contended that the respondent receiving SIM Card at βΉ 316/-which is βΉ 285+Rs.31 service tax paid and balance amount of βΉ 15 is retained by the respondent as commission - this clearly means that for βΉ 31 service tax, assessable value is βΉ 300/- which is inclusively βΉ 285/- paid to BSNL and βΉ 15 retained by the respondent - the commission received by the respondent is already subjected to Service Tax at the hands of BSNL - appeal rejected - decided against appellant-Revenue. Issues: Assessment of service tax on commission received by the respondent for selling SIM cards.Analysis:The case involved an appeal filed by the Revenue against an Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the assessment of service tax on the commission received by the respondent for selling SIM cards. The Revenue contended that the commission received should be considered as assessable value for service tax purposes. The Original Authority had upheld the demand for service tax, interest, and penalty, which was later appealed by the respondent. The Commissioner (Appeals) examined the breakup of the value of the SIM cards sold and concluded that the commission received by the respondent was already part of the assessable value, hence dropping the proceedings and allowing the appeal.In the appeal before the Tribunal, the Revenue maintained that the commission received by the respondent should be subjected to service tax. The respondent, on the other hand, argued that the commission was already included in the assessable value on which BSNL had paid service tax. The Tribunal considered the contentions of both parties and analyzed the pricing structure. It was found that the service tax paid by BSNL was inclusive of the commission received by the respondent. Therefore, the commission had already been subjected to service tax at the hands of BSNL. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue and disposed of the cross-objection raised by the respondent.In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) by determining that the commission received by the respondent for selling SIM cards had already been included in the assessable value for service tax purposes, as the service tax paid by BSNL covered the commission amount. Therefore, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the cross-objection by the respondent was also disposed of.