CENVAT credit on centrally procured capital goods remanded for fresh scrutiny of installation, eligibility, and double-credit safeguards.

CENVAT credit on capital goods centrally procured and installed in different service areas was examined in the context of credit being availed at Salem. The record did not adequately address whether the appellant's organisational and technological method of providing telephone service justified the credit location, or whether safeguards existed against double availment and unresolved duty consequences on removal of the goods. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication after a reasonable opportunity of hearing, leaving the substantive eligibility of credit open for fresh decision.

---

---

Issues: Whether CENVAT credit on capital goods purchased by one unit but installed in other service areas within the same organisational jurisdiction was admissible, and whether the matter required remand for fresh consideration.

Analysis: The capital goods were procured centrally and installed in different service areas, while credit was availed at Salem. The dispute required examination of whether the technological and organisational manner in which the appellant rendered telephone service could justify availment of credit at Salem even though installation was elsewhere, and whether safeguards existed to prevent double availment or unresolved duty consequences on removal of the goods. As these aspects had not been adequately addressed in the earlier proceedings, the matter called for reconsideration in accordance with law.

Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The issue was not finally decided on merits.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded to the extent of remand, leaving the substantive eligibility of the credit open for fresh adjudication.

---