Software valuation for customs remains separate from hardware when software is not embedded firmware, with duty and penalties failing.

Operational software imported with telecom hardware, whether preloaded or supplied separately on CDs/tapes, was treated as retaining its separate identity for customs valuation. The tribunal applied the Chapter 85 classification approach and the settled principle that software value is not added to hardware merely because it is loaded onto equipment, unless it is shown to be embedded firmware or otherwise legally includible on clear evidence. On that basis, the duty demand failed, and the absence of misdeclaration or suppression also meant the extended limitation, confiscation, penalty and redemption fine could not stand.

---

---

Issues: Whether the value of operational software imported preloaded in telecom equipment and also separately on CDs/tapes could be added to the value of the hardware for customs duty purposes, and whether the demand, confiscation, penalty and redemption fine could be sustained.

Analysis: The equipment imported for mobile telecommunications was found to be accompanied by operational software preloaded in the supplier's factory and also supplied separately on recorded media. The governing classification principle under Chapter Note 6 to Chapter 85 was treated as supporting separate treatment of recorded media containing software. The software was not accepted as firmware or embedded software, because the evidence showed it was not etched or permanently incorporated in memory chips. The software retained its character as software even when loaded on the equipment, and the separate CDs/tapes were commercially meaningful backup media rather than a sham import. The Tribunal applied the line of authorities holding that the value of software is not to be clubbed with hardware merely because it is preloaded or integrated, and held that the record did not support a finding of misdeclaration or suppression so as to justify extended limitation. Once the software value was excluded, the foundation for confiscation and the consequent penalty and redemption fine also failed.

Conclusion: The value of the software was not includible in the value of the hardware, the duty demand was unsustainable, and the confiscation, penalty and redemption fine were set aside in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the Commissioner's order was set aside in full, leaving no customs duty demand or consequential penal action in force.

Ratio Decidendi: Operational software recorded on media or preloaded in equipment retains its separate identity for customs purposes and its value cannot be added to the value of the hardware unless it is shown to be embedded firmware or otherwise legally includible on clear evidence.

---