Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest and penalty could be demanded for delayed deposit of refund cheque on the premise that the assessee had not reversed the Cenvat credit lying in balance.
Analysis: The refund of unutilized Cenvat credit had been sanctioned and the cheques were issued, but the Revenue sought interest and penalty on the footing that reversal of credit ought to have been made on receipt of the refund sanction order. The Tribunal found no provision in the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 requiring reversal of the credit merely because a refund order had been passed, and no provision authorising interest for the period between issue of the cheque and its deposit in the bank. It was also noted that the credit covered by the refund claim had not been utilized in the interregnum.
Conclusion: The demand of interest and penalty was not sustainable, and the appeal succeeded.