No question of law arose where concurrent factual findings went against the Department, so the appeal was dismissed.

Concurrent findings of fact were recorded against the Department, and no legal question was shown to arise from those findings. The SC held that the Department had not made out any question of law for consideration. As the dispute turned only on adverse factual findings, the appeal was dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Department had made out any question of law for consideration where the concurrent findings of fact were against it.

Analysis: The authorities below had recorded findings of fact adverse to the Department. No legal question was shown to arise from those findings.

Conclusion: No question of law arose for consideration and the appeal was dismissed.

---