1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Supreme Court dismisses duty set-off appeal for 'treated paper' and 'treated fabric' lacking evidence</h1> The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal on duty set off claimed for 'treated paper' and 'treated fabric' due to lack of evidence showing their use as ... Set off on duty paid on the βtreated paperβ and βtreated fabricβ - the decision in the case of BOMBAY BURMAH TRADING CORPORATION LTD. Versus COMMR. OF C. EX., PUNE-I [2008 (5) TMI 637 - CESTAT MUMBAI], contested - Held that: - the appellant could not give any satisfactory evidence to show that the same product in respect of which duty was paid was used as an intermediary product for the manufacture of the final product - appeal dismissed - decided against appellant. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding duty set off claimed on 'treated paper' and 'treated fabric' from 1976 to 1981 as appellant failed to provide evidence that these products were used as intermediary products for manufacturing laminates. The decision was based on factual findings with no legal question involved.