TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court dismisses duty set-off appeal for 'treated paper' and 'treated fabric' lacking evidence</h1> <h3>Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd. Versus Commissioner</h3> The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal on duty set off claimed for 'treated paper' and 'treated fabric' due to lack of evidence showing their use as ... Set off on duty paid on the ‘treated paper’ and ‘treated fabric’ - the decision in the case of BOMBAY BURMAH TRADING CORPORATION LTD. Versus COMMR. OF C. EX., PUNE-I [2008 (5) TMI 637 - CESTAT MUMBAI], contested - Held that: - the appellant could not give any satisfactory evidence to show that the same product in respect of which duty was paid was used as an intermediary product for the manufacture of the final product - appeal dismissed - decided against appellant. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding duty set off claimed on 'treated paper' and 'treated fabric' from 1976 to 1981 as appellant failed to provide evidence that these products were used as intermediary products for manufacturing laminates. The decision was based on factual findings with no legal question involved.
TaxTMI 
