Tribunal upholds deletion of disallowance on sales expenses, allows deduction for enhanced profits

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the deletion of disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for sales and marketing expenses payable to agents abroad. It allowed the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 10B on enhanced profits due to disallowance, citing CBDT Circular No. 37/2016 and the jurisdictional High Court ruling. The order was pronounced on 21st December 2016.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act.
2. Deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act.
3. Applicability of CBDT Circular No. 37/2016.
4. Jurisdictional High Court ruling in CIT v. Gem Plus Jewellery India Ltd.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act:

The Revenue's appeal contested the deletion of disallowance of Rs. 1,48,37,899/- made under Section 40(a)(ia) for sales and marketing expenses payable to agents abroad, arguing that these expenses are deemed to accrue in India and thus liable for tax deduction at source under Section 195. The DRP had deleted this disallowance based on notarized copies of passports proving that the individuals did not visit India during the relevant year, thus not subject to withholding tax under Section 195. However, the DRP upheld the disallowance of Rs. 1,35,556/- related to John Blyzinskyj due to lack of substantiation regarding his period of stay in India.

2. Deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act:

The assessee, a 100% export-oriented unit under the Software Technology Park of India Scheme, claimed deduction under Section 10B for its entire profit of Rs. 7,60,34,821/-. The AO proposed disallowance of Rs. 1,49,73,455/- under Section 40(a)(i) due to non-deduction of tax at source. The DRP directed deletion of Rs. 1,48,37,899/- of this amount, while confirming the disallowance of Rs. 1,35,556/-. The Tribunal noted that the enhanced profits due to disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) should be considered for deduction under Section 10B, as it is a profit-linked deduction.

3. Applicability of CBDT Circular No. 37/2016:

The Tribunal referred to CBDT Circular No. 37/2016, which states that disallowances under Sections 32, 40(a)(ia), 40A(3), 43B, etc., leading to increased profits are eligible for profit-linked deductions under Chapter VI-A. Although Section 10B is under Chapter III, the Tribunal found the circular's spirit applicable, as Section 10B deductions are also profit-linked. The circular's use of "etc." was interpreted to include disallowances under Section 40(a)(i).

4. Jurisdictional High Court ruling in CIT v. Gem Plus Jewellery India Ltd.:

The Tribunal cited the Bombay High Court's ruling in CIT v. Gem Plus Jewellery India Ltd., which held that statutory disallowances under Section 40(a)(i) enhance profits eligible for deduction under Section 10B. This precedent supported the Tribunal's decision to allow the assessee's claim for deduction on enhanced profits due to disallowance.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, finding it unsustainable in light of CBDT Circular No. 37/2016 and the jurisdictional High Court ruling. The assessee's cross-objection was allowed, confirming that enhanced profits due to disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) are eligible for deduction under Section 10B. The order was pronounced on 21st December 2016.

---