Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether "Swad" is an Ayurvedic medicine or a confectionery item for the purpose of sales tax classification and whether interest was payable on the differential tax demand.
Analysis: The relevant statutory definition of Ayurvedic, Siddha or Unani drug under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act treats medicines intended for diagnosis, treatment, mitigation or prevention of disease or disorder, when manufactured in accordance with authoritative formulae, as drugs. Applying the common parlance test to the ingredients and use of the product, the Court found that "Swad" is consumed for digestion and relief from stomach disorder and cannot be treated as a toffee or candy merely because it is sold at places where confectionery is available. The Court also held that the Assessing Officer produced no contrary evidence to establish that it was confectionery, and that the place of sale does not alter its essential character. On that basis, the rate applied by the assessee was held to be justified, and the consequent interest demand did not survive independently.
Conclusion: "Swad" was held to be an Ayurvedic medicine, not confectionery, and the tax rate of 6% applied by the assessee was upheld; the revenue's challenge on interest also failed.
Ratio Decidendi: For tax classification, the essential character of the product as understood in common parlance, supported by its ingredients and intended medicinal use, prevails over its mere availability in ordinary retail outlets; a product genuinely used as an Ayurvedic preparation is not treated as confectionery absent contrary evidence.