Product liability insurance qualifies as input service for Cenvat credit refund where it is linked to manufacturing and marketing risks.

Product liability insurance taken to cover contamination and liability risks for finished goods was treated as an input service because it was integrally connected with manufacture and marketing of the final products under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. On that basis, refund of unutilized Cenvat credit under Rule 5, read with the refund notification, could not be denied merely because the insurance related to product liability, and the denial of refund was therefore not sustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether product liability insurance qualifies as an input service for the purpose of refund of unutilized Cenvat credit.

Analysis: The claim arose from refund of unutilized Cenvat credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with the relevant refund notification. The disputed service was insurance taken to cover product liability and contamination risk of the final products. Such insurance is integrally connected with the manufacture and marketing of the finished goods and falls within the definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

Conclusion: Product liability insurance is an input service, and the denial of refund on that ground was not sustainable.

---