Second-hand import restrictions and expert valuation support confiscation, sustained assessable value, and reduced redemption fine and penalty.

Second-hand digital multi-functional printers are treated as restricted imports under the Foreign Trade Policy when no required import licence is produced, so confiscation under customs law is justified notwithstanding the existence of a separate NOC. For valuation of second-hand machinery, the assessable value may be based on a Chartered Engineer's certificate where contemporaneous comparable imports are unavailable, especially when supported by policy and prior approval for such assessment. The Tribunal also noted that redemption fine and penalty may be moderated on the facts, and reduced both to align with earlier practice in comparable imports.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether old and used digital multi-functional printers, being second-hand goods, were liable to confiscation for want of import licence under the Foreign Trade Policy; (ii) whether the enhanced assessable value based on the Chartered Engineer's certificate could be sustained; and (iii) whether the redemption fine and penalty required reduction.

Issue (i): Whether old and used digital multi-functional printers, being second-hand goods, were liable to confiscation for want of import licence under the Foreign Trade Policy.

Analysis: The goods were found to be second-hand goods, and under para 2.17 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2009-2014 such goods are restricted for import unless covered by the permitted category or supported by an authorisation. As no import licence had been produced, the goods attracted confiscability under the Customs law. The procurement of a NOC from another authority did not dispense with the statutory import licence requirement.

Conclusion: The confiscation was justified and the finding was against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the enhanced assessable value based on the Chartered Engineer's certificate could be sustained.

Analysis: For second-hand machinery, valuation has to be undertaken on a case-to-case basis having regard to the year of manufacture, present condition and expected life of the equipment. Since comparable contemporaneous imports were not readily available, reliance on the opinion of the expert Chartered Engineer was held to be appropriate. The valuation method was supported by the cited Board circular and judicial approval for such assessment in the case of second-hand machines.

Conclusion: The enhanced valuation was sustained and the finding was against the assessee.

Issue (iii): Whether the redemption fine and penalty required reduction.

Analysis: The Tribunal noted the consistent approach adopted in earlier decisions involving second-hand imported goods, where redemption fine and penalty were moderated to standard percentages of the approved value. In the facts of the case, the original quantum was considered excessive and warranted reduction.

Conclusion: The redemption fine and penalty were reduced, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The confiscation and valuation were upheld, but the monetary consequences were substantially reduced, so the appeal succeeded only to the limited extent of reduction in redemption fine and penalty.

Ratio Decidendi: Second-hand goods covered by a restricted import policy are liable to confiscation if imported without the required licence, and their valuation may be supported by expert assessment where contemporaneous comparables are unavailable, though the consequential fine and penalty may be moderated on the facts.

---