Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit on structural steel and allied items used for supporting plant and machinery was admissible for the period prior to 7 July 2009.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the interpretation of Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and the effect of the amendment that came into force on 7 July 2009. The Tribunal noted that the Larger Bench view treating the amendment as clarificatory had been displaced by subsequent High Court decisions, which held that the amendment was not clarificatory and operated prospectively. Since the goods were used for supporting machinery during the period June 2004 to November 2008, the credit claim had to be tested under the pre-amendment regime. Applying the principle that items used as integral supports for plant and machinery qualify as eligible inputs, and following the later High Court rulings, the Tribunal held that credit could not be denied on the ground adopted in the impugned order.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on structural steel used for supporting plant and machinery was admissible for the period prior to 7 July 2009, and the assessee was entitled to relief.