Imported Goods Classification Upheld, Redemption Fine Reduced, Confiscation Justified

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the classification of imported goods as per the Chemical Examiner's test report, classifying them under CTH 40040000 instead of the declared CTH 4017 00 90. The Tribunal justified the confiscation due to import restrictions under Exim Policy 2004-09. The Tribunal agreed with the reduction of the redemption fine to Rs. 1 Lakh by the Commissioner (Appeals) and further reduced it to Rs. 15,000 based on the circumstances. The impugned Order-in-Appeal was upheld, partially allowing the appeal by reducing the redemption fine.

---

---

Issues: Classification of imported goods under CTH 4017 00 90, confiscation of goods under CTH 40040000, imposition of redemption fine and penalty.

In this case, the appellants imported 'Rubber Crumb' and filed a Bill of Entry for clearance. The Department requested various documents, including a manufacturer's analysis certificate, which the appellants failed to provide. The goods were intended for use as raw material for manufacturing Crumb Rubber Modified Binder. The Chemical Examiner's test report indicated that the imported goods were ground waste of vulcanized rubber tyre powder. The Department classified the goods under CTH 40040000 instead of CTH 4017 00 90 as declared, citing restrictions under Exim Policy 2004-09. The Additional Commissioner of Customs classified the goods under CTH 40040000, confiscated them, and imposed a redemption fine of Rs. 10 Lakh along with a penalty of Rs. 50,000. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the classification and confiscation but reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 1 Lakh and waived the penalty.

Upon review, the Appellate Tribunal observed that the goods did not qualify as 'hard rubber' under CTH 4017, as per the test report, and were correctly classified under CTH 40040000. The Tribunal noted that since the goods under CTH 4004 were restricted and required a license for import, the confiscation was justified. The Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner (Appeals) on the classification issue and the reduction of the redemption fine to Rs. 1 Lakh. However, considering the circumstances, the Tribunal further reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 15,000. Consequently, the impugned Order-in-Appeal was upheld, with the appeal being allowed partially by reducing the redemption fine.

---