Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Upholds Income Tax Appeals Decision on Interest Income Set-off and Section 14A Disallowance

        The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle-I (2), Chennai Versus M/s. Chennai Network Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

        The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle-I (2), Chennai Versus M/s. Chennai Network Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. - TMI Issues Involved:

        1. Deduction under Section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act.
        2. Set off of interest income earned on Inter-Corporate Deposits (ICDs) from pre-operative expenditure.
        3. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.

        Detailed Analysis:

        Issue 1: Deduction under Section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act

        The primary issue was whether the assessee is entitled to claim deduction under Section 57(iii) towards the proportional interest expenditure against the interest income earned from term deposits during the pre-operative period. The assessee had borrowed a substantial loan from the bank and placed a portion of it in fixed deposits, earning interest. The Revenue contended that this interest income should be taxed under 'Income from other sources' and disallowed the interest expenditure claimed against it.

        The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) relied on the jurisdictional High Court's decision in CIT Vs. VGR Foundation (298 ITR 132), which allowed such set-offs under Section 57(iii) if the interest earned during the pre-operative period is linked to the business setup. The Tribunal upheld this view, stating that the proportional interest expenditure incurred for earning the interest income should be allowed as a deduction under Section 57(iii). The Tribunal also referenced the Supreme Court's decision in Bokaro Steels Ltd., which relaxed the earlier decision in Tuticorin Alkalis Chemicals & Fertilizers, indicating that interest income earned during the pre-operative period should reduce the expenditure if linked to the capital structure setup.

        Issue 2: Set off of Interest Income Earned on ICDs from Pre-Operative Expenditure

        The second issue was whether the assessee could set off interest received from ICDs against pre-operative expenses. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) held that the interest income earned from ICDs, sourced from interest-free share application money, should be set off against pre-operative expenses. This decision was supported by the jurisdictional High Court's ruling in VGR Foundation, which stated that share application money does not fall under borrowed funds and is linked to the business setup.

        The Tribunal agreed with this view, referencing the Supreme Court's decisions in Bokaro Steels Ltd. and Karnataka Power Corporation, which supported the set-off of interest income against pre-operative expenses if the funds were inextricably linked to the business setup.

        Issue 3: Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act

        The final issue was the disallowance of Rs. 1,66,51,972 under Section 14A of the Act. The assessee argued that since they were in the pre-operative stage, all expenses should be capitalized, and no expenditure related to earning exempt income should be disallowed. Furthermore, the assessee claimed that the investment was made in 'growth mutual funds,' which generate taxable capital gains, not exempt income.

        The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer to verify if the investments were indeed in 'growth mutual funds' and, if so, directed the deletion of the disallowance under Section 14A. The Tribunal found merit in this approach, stating that if the investments yield taxable capital gains, Section 14A would not apply as it deals with expenditure related to income not includible in total income.

        Conclusion:

        The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions on all three issues, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that the interest income earned during the pre-operative period should be set off against related expenses if linked to the business setup and that Section 14A disallowance does not apply to investments yielding taxable capital gains.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found