Tribunal Upholds Disallowance of Cash Payments & Loss on Sale

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s orders disallowing Rs. 13,11,455 under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000, and disallowing Rs. 14,74,982 loss on the sale of fenders. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to meet the exceptions specified in Rule 6DD for cash payments and did not provide sufficient evidence to support the claimed loss on the sale of fenders, determining that the fenders were not purchased for trading purposes but for rental income.

---

---

Issues involved:
1. Disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Disallowance of loss on sale of fenders.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

The assessee firm, engaged in the business of supplying stores to ships, filed its return of income for AY 2009-10. The A.O. disallowed Rs. 13,11,455/- under section 40A(3) for cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000/-. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance. The assessee contended that the payments were made in cash due to business exigencies and lack of RTGS/NEFT facilities at the time, arguing that the genuineness of the transactions and the identity of the suppliers were not in doubt. The assessee relied on several judgments and a CBDT Circular to support its claim.

The Tribunal, after considering the arguments, held that section 40A(3) is an overriding and mandatory provision, and the only exceptions are those specified in Rule 6DD. The assessee failed to demonstrate that its case fell under these exceptions. The Tribunal noted that the pre-amended provisions of Rule 6DD(j), which allowed for exceptions due to business exigencies, were omitted from the statute effective from AY 1996-97. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee's reliance on the cited judgments and the CBDT Circular, which were based on the pre-amended provisions. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, sustaining the disallowance of Rs. 13,11,455/- under section 40A(3).

Issue 2: Disallowance of loss on sale of fenders

The assessee claimed a loss of Rs. 14,74,982/- on the sale of fenders, which were purchased in FY 2007-08 and reflected as fixed assets in the balance sheet. The A.O. disallowed this loss, treating it as a capital loss, and the CIT(A) upheld this view. The assessee argued that the fenders were purchased in the normal course of business and inadvertently reflected as fixed assets. The assessee claimed that the fenders were rented out due to failed delivery to a customer and subsequently sold.

The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to substantiate its claim with any documentary evidence, such as an order or correspondence from a customer. The Tribunal noted that the systematic and regular purchase of fenders over a period of three months and their immediate rental indicated a predetermined intent to commercially exploit the fenders. The Tribunal concluded that the fenders were not purchased for trading but for rental income, disallowing the claimed business loss. The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's reliance on the judgment in Universal Plast Ltd. vs. CIT, as it was not relevant to the issue at hand.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s orders on both issues. The disallowance of Rs. 13,11,455/- under section 40A(3) and the disallowance of Rs. 14,74,982/- pertaining to the loss on sale of fenders were sustained.

---