Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit on steel structural items, oxygen gas, and welding electrodes was admissible for the relevant period, and whether the amendment introducing Explanation 2 to the definition of input operated prospectively.
Analysis: The disputed goods were used during July 2008 to July 2009, and the steel items had been used before the amendment dated 07.07.2009. The definition of input, as interpreted with Explanation 2, covered goods used in the manufacture of capital goods used in the factory. The amendment introduced by Notification No. 16/2009-C.E. (N.T.) was held to be prospective and not available to deny credit for the earlier period. The same view had been followed in later Tribunal decisions, and credit on oxygen gas and welding electrodes used for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery had also been recognised.
Conclusion: The denial of Cenvat credit was unsustainable and the credit was admissible to the assessee.