Suppression of material facts justified extended limitation and penalties for undisclosed wagon supplies to oil companies.

Suppression of material facts justified invocation of the extended period of limitation and penalties where wagons supplied for oil companies were not disclosed as such in the returns. The demand on merits was not disputed; the controversy was confined to limitation and penalty. Contract terms and correspondence showed that the supplies were meant for oil companies, but that fact was withheld from the department, and the claimed bona fide belief about exemption was not accepted because the contractual clauses were too general to support it. On these facts, the department was unaware of the true nature of the clearances, so the extended period and consequential penalties were upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the extended period of limitation and penalties were rightly invoked on the ground of suppression of material facts in relation to wagons supplied for oil companies.

Analysis: The demand on merits was not contested. The dispute was confined to limitation and penalty. The contract terms and related correspondence indicated that the wagons were meant for oil companies, but this crucial fact was not disclosed to the department in the returns. The claimed bona fide belief based on the railway ministry's understanding of exemption was not accepted on the facts, as the contractual clauses were general and did not support the assertion that the goods were exempt in the manner claimed. In these circumstances, the department was unaware of the true nature of the supplies, and the case was detected only on specific information, justifying invocation of the extended period and imposition of penalties.

Conclusion: The extended period of limitation and the penalties were rightly upheld, against the appellant.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed in full, and the demand along with consequential penalties stood sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee does not disclose material facts regarding the nature of clearances, suppression justifies invocation of the extended limitation period and penalty.

---