TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on welding electrodes used for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery. (ii) Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on steel items such as MS plates, angles and channels used in fabrication of plant and machinery.
Issue (i): Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on welding electrodes used for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery.
Analysis: The entitlement was examined by applying the settled position that welding electrodes used for repair and maintenance of machinery are to be treated as eligible inputs for credit purposes. The reasoning followed prior Tribunal authority recognising such electrodes as cenvatable when used in the maintenance of plant and machinery.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on welding electrodes was admissible and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on steel items such as MS plates, angles and channels used in fabrication of plant and machinery.
Analysis: The entitlement depended on the user test and on whether the steel items were used in fabrication of support structures forming part of the plant and machinery. The reasoning applied the principle that structurals used for fabrication of machinery support structures, components, spares or accessories fall within the ambit of capital goods, and that mere characterisation as immovable property does not defeat credit where the items are integrally used in the machinery setup.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on the steel items was admissible and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The denial of credit was unsustainable because both welding electrodes and steel structurals were held eligible for Cenvat credit on the facts found, and the impugned order was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods used in the repair and maintenance of plant and machinery, and structurals used in fabrication of support structures for machinery, are eligible for Cenvat credit when the user test shows they form an integral part of the capital goods setup.
TaxTMI 
