Captive-use exemption for NCCD denied where notification lacked express inclusion, but penalty was deleted for bona fide dispute.

Partially oriented yarn used captively within the factory for further manufacture was treated as not eligible for exemption from National Calamity Contingent Duty under Notification No. 67/95-C.E., because the notification expressly covered exemption for goods used in relation to AED (GSI) and did not expressly extend that benefit to NCCD, even though the charging provisions were treated as pari materia. The duty demand was therefore sustained. On penalty, the interpretational nature of the dispute and the absence of intent to evade duty led to deletion of the penalty.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether Partially Oriented Yarn used within the factory for further manufacture was exempt from National Calamity Contingent Duty under Notification No. 67/95-C.E.; (ii) Whether penalty was leviable in the facts of the case.

Issue (i): Whether Partially Oriented Yarn used within the factory for further manufacture was exempt from National Calamity Contingent Duty under Notification No. 67/95-C.E.

Analysis: Section 136(3) of the Finance Act, 2001 was treated as pari materia with Section 3(3) of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957. Notification No. 67/95-C.E. expressly grants exemption for goods used within the factory in relation to AED (GSI), and the absence of an equivalent express inclusion of NCCD in that notification was considered material. On that basis, the exemption was not extended to NCCD for captive consumption.

Conclusion: The exemption from NCCD was held not to be available.

Issue (ii): Whether penalty was leviable in the facts of the case.

Analysis: In view of the interpretational issues surrounding the levy and the benefit claimed, no intent to evade duty was found to justify penalty.

Conclusion: The penalty was set aside.

Final Conclusion: The demand was sustained, but the penalty was deleted, resulting in only partial relief to the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification for a specific duty cannot be extended to NCCD in the absence of express inclusion, even where the charging and recovery provisions are analogous; however, penalty may be unwarranted where the dispute turns on a bona fide interpretation.

---