Tribunal grants sugar mill Cenvat credit on cement for machinery foundations, citing expanded scope of inputs.

The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by a sugar mill against Orders-in-Appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Lucknow, regarding entitlement to Cenvat credit on cement used in machinery foundations. The Tribunal held that the cement used in machinery erection qualifies as an eligible input under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, for manufacturing dutiable goods. Relying on relevant case law and the expanded scope of inputs under the Rules, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, granting the appellant consequential benefits in accordance with the law.

---

---

Issues:
1. Entitlement to Cenvat credit on cement used in the foundation of machineries for the manufacture of taxable products.

Detailed Analysis:
The appellant, a sugar mill engaged in manufacturing, filed appeals against Orders-in-Appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Lucknow, regarding the entitlement to Cenvat credit on cement used in machinery foundations. The dispute revolved around whether the cement used in the foundation work qualifies for Cenvat credit as inputs for manufacturing taxable products. The appellant argued that the cement was essential for the erection of machinery, without which the production of dutiable goods would not be possible. The Show Cause Notices were issued to disallow the credit on cement, leading to penalties imposed under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

The appellant contended that under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, they were eligible for Cenvat credit on cement used in the factory for the manufacture of final products. They highlighted Rule 2(k) which defines credit as all goods used in the factory for manufacturing final products, directly or indirectly. The appellant cited relevant case laws, such as the ruling of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore-II v. SLR Steels Ltd., supporting the eligibility of Cenvat credit on inputs like steel and cement used in the fabrication of capital goods. They emphasized that the cement was a crucial input for the erection of machinery, as established by the Hon'ble Madras High Court in India Cements Ltd. v. Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai.

The Tribunal, after considering the arguments, held that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in relying on a previous ruling under different rules. It emphasized that under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the scope of inputs had expanded, allowing for the inclusion of cement and iron & steel used in supporting structures for machinery erection as eligible inputs. The Tribunal concluded that the cement used in the erection of machinery was essential for manufacturing dutiable goods, thus entitling the appellant to Cenvat credit. Consequently, both appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside, granting the appellant consequential benefits as per the law.

---