Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed on the assessee could be set aside under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the basis of bona fide belief and reasonable cause.
Analysis: The Tribunal's view that the assessee acted under a bona fide impression was supported by the facts that the contract had been executed in 1999 and the service tax liability for such services was introduced later. The Court also declined to entertain a new factual contention urged for the first time in appeal, as it had not been raised before the Tribunal or in the memorandum of appeal. The findings of the Tribunal were treated as based on proper appreciation of the material and did not warrant interference.
Conclusion: The invocation of Section 80 to waive penalty was upheld and the penalty order was not interfered with.