Customs valuation requires a clear nexus and sale condition before royalty and know-how payments can be added to assessable value.

Royalty and technical know-how payments are includible in customs assessable value only where the Revenue establishes a clear nexus with the imported goods and shows that the payment was a condition of sale under Rule 9(1)(c). The text notes that the imported chocolates and raw materials came from a group company, not from the foreign collaborator under the technical collaboration agreement, and no restrictive clause linked the goods to the collaborator. As the supplier was not shown to be a related person for valuation purposes, the declared value could not be rejected and the royalty-related amounts were held not includible.

---

---

Issues: Whether royalty and technical know-how payments, and the value of imports from a group company, were liable to be added to the assessable value of the imported goods under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.

Analysis: The declared value had to be examined under Rule 4(3) for acceptance or otherwise, and the inclusion of any amount under Rule 9(1)(c) required a clear nexus between the payments and the imported goods as well as evidence of a condition of sale. The goods in question were finished chocolates and certain raw materials imported from a group company, not from the foreign collaborator under the technical collaboration agreement. The Revenue did not establish any restrictive clause in the agreement linking the imports of cocoa powder or cocoa butter flavour to the collaborator, nor did it show that the supplier of the imported goods was related to the importer so as to justify rejection of the declared value.

Conclusion: The amounts on account of royalty and technical know-how were not includible in the assessable value, and Rule 9(1)(c) could not be invoked.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal succeeded.

Ratio Decidendi: Addition to customs assessable value is permissible only when the Revenue establishes the necessary legal nexus or sale condition between the payment and the imported goods; in the absence of such nexus, related-party or royalty considerations do not justify invocation of Rule 9(1)(c).

---