Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under sections 234A and 234B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be sustained in the facts of the case, and if so, for what period.
Analysis: The enhanced compensation was credited after the award and the petitioner's account had already been attached for recovery of tax dues. The petitioner was advised to pay tax on a year-to-year basis and, acting on that advice, filed returns on 08.01.1999 after the amount became available. The respondents accepted and acted upon those returns. In these circumstances, liability to interest under section 234A did not arise. As regards section 234B, the interest could not extend beyond the date on which the respondents received the petitioner's letter requesting adjustment from the attached account. The Court also noted that the statutory waiver framework under section 119(2)(a) had already been invoked and partial relief had been granted.
Conclusion: Interest under section 234A was not leviable, and interest under section 234B was restricted to the period 15.12.1998 to 23.12.1998 only.
Ratio Decidendi: Where tax liability is effectively recoverable from an attached account and the assessee has acted on departmental advice in filing returns, interest cannot be charged beyond the point at which the revenue had notice and the means to recover the dues.