2016 (12) TMI 486 - HC - Service Tax

High Court allows delay condonation for Assessee's appeal, balancing justice and procedure.

The High Court allowed the condonation of delay in filing appeals before the Tribunal by the Assessee, emphasizing the importance of balancing justice and ... Condonation of delay - Held that: - One of the fundamental principles of law which is consistently followed while dealing with Applications seeking condonation of delay is that if the cause of justice is likely to suffer, the delay that has occasioned in approaching the Court concerned should be dealt with on liberal lines and normally deserves to be condoned, if necessary by putting the party at default on some terms. Normally, the delay can be refused to be condoned where the rights of the other party, which have crystallized in the meantime are likely to be impacted by condonation of such delay. The delay also is not permitted to be condoned where the opposite party has altered its position under bonafide impression that the party who has suffered the decree has accepted that. In such circumstances, condonation of delay is construed to cause, undue and irreversible hardship to the opposite side. In such cases, delay can be declined to be condoned - In the instant case, the Appellant has shown the reason for occasioning of the delay. He has pointed out that he has some medical issue that required greater attention to be paid by him. A certificate from the competent Physician has also been produced to vouch for the said fact. In such circumstances, a liberal approach ought to have been adopted by the Tribunal for condonation of delay, particularly when the delay is only of 291 days, but not an enormous or abnormal one. What surprised us the most is, the observation of the Tribunal that irreversible hardship would be caused to the Department in recovering the dues. The Department as part of the Central Government had the necessary authority and there are adequate measures provided for effecting recovery of arrears. Therefore, the delay of 291 days in preferring the appeal cannot be construed as to be causing such an unsurmountable hardship to the Government of India in the matter of recovery of dues by it. Therefore, we are of the opinion that the order passed by the Tribunal declining to condone the delay is not justified and is an unsustainable one and hence it is set aside The delay in preferring the appeal before the Tribunal by the Appellant/Assessee is condoned subject to payment of ₹ 3,000/- in each case representing compensatory costs, within 15 days from today, in the Office of the Commissioner of Service Tax concerned, Chennai. Upon production of the receipt for payment of ₹ 3,000/- in each case, the Tribunal will proceed to entertain the appeals and deal with them on merits. If for any reason, the Appellant fails from payment of costs, it shall be construed that the Final Order Nos.41421 and 41422 of 2015 dated 15.10.2015, passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai, are accepted by him without any further reference to this Court. Delay condoned - decided in favor of assessee. Issues:Delay in filing appeals before the Tribunal, Condonation of delay, Impact on Revenue recovery, Legal principles for condonation of delay.Analysis:The judgment concerns the condonation of delay in filing appeals before the Tribunal by the Assessee, who challenged Final Orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai. The Appellant cited a delay of 291 days due to the Appellant's illness and oversight in noticing the receipt of Orders in Original. The Tribunal, however, denied condonation, citing potential hardship to Revenue recovery and a lenient approach towards Assessees. The High Court emphasized the legal principle that delay should be condoned if justice is at stake and if the opposing party's rights are not adversely affected. The Court noted the Appellant's medical issue and the produced physician's certificate, advocating a liberal approach for condonation, especially for a relatively short delay.The High Court criticized the Tribunal's view on irreversible hardship to the Revenue, highlighting the Government's authority and measures for debt recovery. The Court deemed the delay of 291 days not causing insurmountable hardship to the Government, leading to the setting aside of the Tribunal's decision. Consequently, the High Court ordered the condonation of delay subject to the payment of compensatory costs by the Appellant within 15 days. Failure to pay would result in the acceptance of the Tribunal's Final Orders without further reference to the Court. The judgment emphasized the importance of balancing justice with procedural requirements and ensuring fairness in legal proceedings.In conclusion, the High Court allowed the condonation of delay, stressing the need for a balanced approach in legal matters. The judgment highlighted the significance of upholding principles of justice while considering procedural aspects, ultimately aiming to maintain fairness and equity in legal proceedings.